Early Preview: Jennifer Aniston, Owen Wilson In “Marley & Me”

Marley & Me Book CoverComing to the big screen: The best-selling book that turned even Howard Stern into a soft-hearted wimp.

Jennifer Aniston and Owen Wilson have signed on for the film version of Marley & Me, the non-fiction hit about a pesky, misbehaving Labrador Retriever that becomes a huge part of columnist John Grogan’s family.

THE DIRECTOR: David Frankel (The Devil Wears Prada (ugh), Miami Rhapsody, about six 2003 Sex and the City episodes)

THE SCREENWRITER: Variety reports the latest draft is being written by Scott Frank (Out of Sight, Minority Report, The Lookout)

THE PRODUCTION: Tentatively scheduled to begin in early 2008

If Frankel and Frank (heh, heh) decide to go the “aw shucks” comedy route, this could be the framework for another annoying entry from Owen Wilson (as in You, Me and Dupree). Luckily, Wilson can shed that in Wes Anderson’s upcoming The Darjeeling Limited — he always shines in buddy’s Wes’s entries. He’s now shooting the Ben Stiller-directed actors-turned-soldiers comedy Tropic Thunder.

Jennifer Aniston, always solid and interesting, even in mediocre films, is also signed on for a 2009 release of He’s Just Not That Into You, from other Sex and The City alums, writers Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo.

QUESTION: Is Marley & Me a good choice for a movie adaptation? TELL US

Digg This Story

Other Posts of Interest

6 Comments

  1. Comment by rod / upcomingdiscs.com on August 20, 2007 10:43 am

    I haven’t read the book, but I imagine this movie will be a suitable adaptation for the same crowd that gobbles up every tired “coming of age / this is a methaphor for life” sickly sweet treacly plot line.

    Heh! I’m not a bitter old man, really.

  2. Comment by Norm S. on August 20, 2007 1:11 pm

    - Rod -

    You may be right. It could even be a down-the-middle family movie, but I’m thinking that’s unlikely if Scott Frank is getting his hands on it.

    In a case like this, I think the studios like to make sure the movie immediately attracts the book’s readers — it’s the ultimate built-in audience. It’s different when a book doesn’t have much visibility, and is just taken as a good literary source.

    Talk to you again.

    -Norm S.

  3. Comment by Donna on August 28, 2007 10:27 pm

    If they can get a suitable Marley character-it is a sure winner. Anyone who hasn’t read the book cannot really comment on the film adaptation.

  4. Comment by Norm S. on August 29, 2007 11:48 am

    - Donna -

    You mean they need to cast the right dog? I never thought of it that way, but you’ve got a great point!

    And I agree — no one can comment on a film adaptation if they haven’t read the book. How else can they judge the quality of the adaptation?

    However, in my opinion, anyone who see any movie has a right to comment on it. Those comments may not be within the context of having read the book, but if they saw the movie, that’s what they should talk about.

    A colleague of mine was crucified years ago for giving Black Hawk Down a negative review. He got tons of hate mail from people saying a) he must not have read the book; and b) if he had read the book, he’d understand.

    Well, a) he had read the book and b) he still thought the movie sucked.

    Just an anecdote I thought you might look. Here’s the review if you’re interested: http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Black-Hawk-Down

    See you Donna. Thanks for coming by.

    -Norm S.

  5. Comment by Linda G. on August 29, 2007 1:11 pm

    I did read “Marley and Me” and I think my dog Buddy could play the dog part of Marley. While reading the book, I could have sworn the author had been peeping in my windows at Buddy.

    Anyway, I hope they don’t make the movie stupid like “Underdog” or “Airbud.” It should be more like a “Lassie” type movie but with better acting from the humans.

    I sure do hope Owen Wilson can pull this off. I personally think they should have asked Johnny Depp to play the owner. He’s a convincing actor in both drama and comedy, which this movie will require both.

  6. Comment by Norm S. on August 29, 2007 1:19 pm

    - Linda G. -

    I’d be disappointed if this became an overly family-friendly comedy. I don’t mind heartwarming, but there’s gotta be some guts behind it. Otherwise, it’s just a Hallmark card.

    I like your Johnny Depp idea, but this may be too mainstream for his ideas and approaches. Mark Ruffalo? Josh Hartnett? Paul Giamatti?!

    Give my best to Buddy.

    Best,

    Norm S.

Leave a comment